R03: Drugs for obstructive airway diseases

ATC R03 drugs for obstructive airway diseases for modelers: the dose splits before you model anything; plasma is a poor surrogate for local effect; isolating the lung dose.
Modified

September 22, 2026

The dose splits before you model anything. Part deposits in the lung and is absorbed without first pass; the swallowed fraction goes to the gut and is subject to it [1,2]. Plasma concentration is the sum of two inputs with different rates and bioavailabilities [3,4] (see absorption).

Plasma is a poor surrogate for local effect. It tracks systemic safety, adrenal suppression for corticosteroids and tremor for beta-2 agonists, far better than it tracks bronchodilation [5,6]. Modern inhaled corticosteroids are designed to widen that gap through near-complete first-pass removal of the swallowed fraction [5,7].

Isolating the lung dose. A charcoal block prevents gut absorption and is the established way to measure the pulmonary portion [8,9]. It is redundant for corticosteroids whose swallowed fraction is already non-bioavailable.

Endpoint. FEV1, strongly baseline-dependent, so models use change from baseline with an explicit placebo component [10,11], plus a circadian term when spirometry is serial. Bronchodilator dose-response on FEV1 saturates early and is noisy [12], which is why methacholine challenge is used to separate closely spaced doses [13].

Corticosteroid effect is not concentration-driven. It builds over repeated dosing, so the model needs a time-course component rather than a direct link [14,15]. The registrational endpoint is often exacerbation rate, an over-dispersed count [16,17].

Mechanistic extrapolation. Lung PBPK is established here, predicting regional deposition, dissolution and local versus systemic exposure for inhaled drugs whose plasma levels cannot report airway concentration, and supporting inhaled bioequivalence [18,19].

Device variability. The device is a major source of exposure variability that oral and intravenous drugs do not have [7]. The same molecule from different devices can differ roughly two-fold in pulmonary bioavailability [20], and airway obstruction itself alters deposition, so the most obstructed patients may receive the least drug [21,22].

References

[1]
Donnelly R, Seale JP. Clinical pharmacokinetics of inhaled budesonide. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2001;40:427–40. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200140060-00004.
[2]
Daley-Yates PT, Price AC, Sisson JR, Pereira A, Dallow N. Beclomethasone dipropionate: Absolute bioavailability, pharmacokinetics and metabolism following intravenous, oral, intranasal and inhaled administration in man. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2001;51:400–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01374.x.
[3]
Borghardt JM, Weber B, Staab A, Kunz C, Formella S, Kloft C. Investigating pulmonary and systemic pharmacokinetics of inhaled olodaterol in healthy volunteers using a population pharmacokinetic approach. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2016;81:538–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12780.
[4]
Hochhaus G, Chen M-J, Kurumaddali A, Schilling U, Jiao Y, Drescher SK, et al. Can pharmacokinetic studies assess the pulmonary fate of dry powder inhaler formulations of fluticasone propionate? The AAPS Journal 2021;23:48. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-021-00569-x.
[5]
Daley-Yates PT. Inhaled corticosteroids: Potency, dose equivalence and therapeutic index. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2015;80:372–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12637.
[6]
Whale CI, Sovani MP, Mortimer KJ, Harrison TW, Tattersfield AE. Systemic and bronchodilator effects of inhaled rac-formoterol in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A dose-response study. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2008;65:841–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03081.x.
[7]
Borghardt JM, Weber B, Staab A, Kloft C. Pharmacometric models for characterizing the pharmacokinetics of orally inhaled drugs. The AAPS Journal 2015;17:853–70. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-015-9760-6.
[8]
van Haarst A, McGarvey L, Paglialunga S. Review of drug development guidance to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: US and EU perspectives. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2019;106:1222–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1540.
[9]
Chrystyn H. Methods to identify drug deposition in the lungs following inhalation. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2001;51:289–99. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.01304.x.
[10]
Wu K, Looby M, Pillai G, Pinault G, Drollman AF, Pascoe S. Population pharmacodynamic model of the longitudinal FEV1 response to an inhaled long-acting anti-muscarinic in COPD patients. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics 2011;38:105–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-010-9180-2.
[11]
Yang S, Simeoni M, Beerahee M. Longitudinal model-based meta-analysis of lung function response to support phase III study design in Chinese patients with asthma. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2022;111:1286–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2578.
[12]
Blake K, Madabushi R, Derendorf H, Lima J. Population pharmacodynamic model of bronchodilator response to inhaled albuterol in children and adults with asthma. Chest 2008;134:981–9. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.07-2991.
[13]
Hendeles L, Daley-Yates PT, Hermann R, De Backer J, Dissanayake S, Horhota ST. Pharmacodynamic studies to demonstrate bioequivalence of oral inhalation products. The AAPS Journal 2015;17:758–68. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-015-9735-7.
[14]
Back HM, Lee JB, Kim A, Park SJ, Kim J, Chae JW, et al. Exposure-response and clinical outcome modeling of inhaled budesonide/formoterol combination in asthma patients. Pharmaceutics 2020;12:336. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12040336.
[15]
Musuamba FT, Teutonico D, Maas HJ, Facius A, Yang S, Danhof M, et al. Prediction of disease progression, treatment response and dropout in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Pharmaceutical Research 2015;32:617–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-014-1490-4.
[16]
Llanos-Paez C, Ambery C, Yang S, Beerahee M, Plan EL, Karlsson MO. Joint longitudinal model-based meta-analysis of FEV1 and exacerbation rate in randomized COPD trials. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics 2023;50:297–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-023-09853-z.
[17]
Chia YL, Yan L, Yu B, Wang B, Barker P, Goldman M, et al. Relationship between benralizumab exposure and efficacy for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2019;106:383–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1371.
[18]
Boger E, Evans N, Chappell M, Lundqvist A, Ewing P, Wigenborg A, et al. Systems pharmacology approach for prediction of pulmonary and systemic pharmacokinetics and receptor occupancy of inhaled drugs. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology 2016;5:201–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12074.
[19]
Miller NA, Graves RH, Edwards CD, Amour A, Taylor E, Robb O, et al. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling of inhaled nemiralisib: Mechanistic components for pulmonary absorption, systemic distribution, and oral absorption. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2021;61:281–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-021-01066-2.
[20]
Usmani OS, Molimard M, Gaur V, Gogtay J, Singh GJP, Malhotra G, et al. Scientific rationale for determining the bioequivalence of inhaled drugs. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2017;56:1139–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-017-0524-6.
[21]
Mortimer KJ, Harrison TW, Tang Y, Wu K, Lewis S, Sahasranaman S, et al. Plasma concentrations of inhaled corticosteroids in relation to airflow obstruction in asthma. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2006;62:412–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02712.x.
[22]
Borghardt JM, Weber B, Staab A, Kunz C, Kloft C. Model-based evaluation of pulmonary pharmacokinetics in asthmatic and COPD patients after oral olodaterol inhalation. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2016;82:739–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12999.