R03: Drugs for obstructive airway diseases

ATC R03 holds drugs for asthma, COPD and other obstructive airway diseases: inhaled bronchodilators and steroids, and drugs taken by mouth or injected.
Updated

September 25, 2026

R03 holds the drugs for asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and other diseases that narrow the airways. WHO splits them into inhaled groups (R03A and R03B) and systemic groups (R03C and R03D).

In April 1955, Susie Maison asked her father George Maison, president of Riker Laboratories, why her asthma medicine could not come in a spray can like hair spray. Her question led to the development of the pressurized metered dose inhaler. The first two products were approved on 9 March 1956 [1].

How do drugs for obstructive airway diseases work?

Bronchodilators include the β2-agonists (R03AC), such as salbutamol (R03AC02) and formoterol (R03AC13), and the muscarinic antagonists (R03BB), such as tiotropium bromide (R03BB04). The long-acting forms of both relax human airway smooth muscle [2]. Muscarinic antagonists act against acetylcholine, which constricts airway smooth muscle through muscarinic M3 receptors [3].

Inhaled corticosteroids (R03BA), such as budesonide (R03BA02) and fluticasone (R03BA05), act against inflammation locally in the airways. Their topical anti-inflammatory activity is driven by binding to the glucocorticoid receptor [4]. Fixed combinations of a β2-agonist and a corticosteroid, such as formoterol and budesonide (R03AK07), are in R03AK.

Monoclonal antibodies in R03DX include mepolizumab (R03DX09), which binds interleukin-5 and keeps it from binding to its receptor on a type of white blood cell (eosinophils) [5].

Delivery to the lung

Inhalation delivers a drug directly to the lung, which gives high concentrations there and low concentrations in the blood. Particles that deposit in the mouth and throat are swallowed, and the fraction that reaches the lung depends on particle size, inhalation flow, the device and the disease. In the conducting airways, the mucus moved by tiny beating hairs (mucociliary clearance) carries undissolved particles up to the throat, where they are also swallowed. Dissolved drug is absorbed quickly from the air sacs (alveoli) and slowly from the conducting airways. In asthma and COPD, deposition is more central, and the pulmonary absorption of olodaterol (R03AC19) was slower in patients than in healthy volunteers [6].

How much of the swallowed part reaches the blood depends on the molecule: fluticasone propionate, fluticasone furoate (R03BA09), mometasone furoate (R03BA07) and ciclesonide (R03BA08) have high first-pass metabolism and negligible oral bioavailability, while budesonide and beclometasone dipropionate (R03BA01) have significant oral bioavailability [4].

Published pharmacokinetic models of inhaled drugs range from physiologically based models of these pulmonary processes to empirical models derived from clinical data, and relating plasma pharmacokinetics to the effect in the lung remains a challenge [7].

In the EU, bioequivalence of inhaled products is shown stepwise: in vitro comparisons first, then pharmacokinetic studies of lung and systemic bioavailability, and clinical endpoint studies only if those criteria are not met. Pharmacokinetic studies are more sensitive than clinical endpoint studies to small differences in deposition and absorption [8].

Efficacy

Lung function and exacerbations

COPD trials record lung function as trough FEV1, the forced expiratory volume in the first second, which is continuous, and count flare-ups (exacerbations), which they report as an annual rate. In a model-based meta-analysis of 298 such trials, FEV1 was described with a baseline, a linear disease progression of about 32 mL per year, a placebo effect, and drug effects with an Emax dose-response where the data allowed. The same analysis linked the drug effects on FEV1 to the annual rate of moderate or severe exacerbations [9]. A population model has also predicted disease progression, treatment response and dropout together in COPD [10]. When counts vary more than a Poisson model allows, which is called overdispersion, the negative binomial model is the main alternative [11].

Eosinophils

For mepolizumab, the fall in blood eosinophil count was described with an indirect response model, with a maximal decrease of about 85% from baseline and a half-maximal inhibitory concentration of about 0.45 µg/mL [5].

Safety

The class-related adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroids include hoarseness, a yeast infection (candidiasis) of the mouth and throat, reduced cortisol production by the adrenal glands (adrenal suppression), growth retardation in children, decreased bone mineral density, cataract, glaucoma and, in COPD, pneumonia. Suppression of cortisol secretion is the most sensitive and easily monitored biomarker of their systemic effects. One way to express their therapeutic index is the daily dose that suppresses cortisol by 20%, divided by the therapeutic dose. Their systemic exposure is lower in more severe asthma, when lung function is lower [4]. In a meta-analysis of corticosteroid users with asthma, too little cortisol from the adrenal glands (adrenal insufficiency) became more common with higher doses (from 2.4% at low to 21.5% at high doses) and with longer use (from 1.4% under 28 days to 27.4% over a year) [12].

Both long-acting β2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists can affect the cardiovascular system. Their fixed-dose combinations have had an acceptable cardiovascular safety profile in the COPD populations of randomized trials [2].

References

[1]
Stein SW, Thiel CG. The history of therapeutic aerosols: A chronological review. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery 2017;30:20–41. https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2016.1297.
[2]
Cazzola M, Page C, Rogliani P, Calzetta L, Matera MG. Dual bronchodilation for the treatment of COPD: From bench to bedside. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2022;88:3657–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15390.
[3]
Lipworth BJ. Emerging role of long acting muscarinic antagonists for asthma. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2014;77:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12123.
[4]
Daley-Yates PT. Inhaled corticosteroids: Potency, dose equivalence and therapeutic index. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2015;80:372–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12637.
[5]
Smith DA, Minthorn EA, Beerahee M. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mepolizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2011;50:215–27. https://doi.org/10.2165/11584340-000000000-00000.
[6]
Borghardt JM, Kloft C, Sharma A. Inhaled therapy in respiratory disease: The complex interplay of pulmonary kinetic processes. Canadian Respiratory Journal 2018;2018:2732017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2732017.
[7]
Borghardt JM, Weber B, Staab A, Kloft C. Pharmacometric models for characterizing the pharmacokinetics of orally inhaled drugs. The AAPS Journal 2015;17:853–70. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-015-9760-6.
[8]
Usmani OS, Molimard M, Gaur V, Gogtay J, Singh GJP, Malhotra G, et al. Scientific rationale for determining the bioequivalence of inhaled drugs. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2017;56:1139–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-017-0524-6.
[9]
Llanos-Paez C, Ambery C, Yang S, Beerahee M, Plan EL, Karlsson MO. Joint longitudinal model-based meta-analysis of FEV1 and exacerbation rate in randomized COPD trials. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics 2023;50:297–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-023-09853-z.
[10]
Musuamba FT, Teutonico D, Maas HJ, Facius A, Yang S, Danhof M, et al. Prediction of disease progression, treatment response and dropout in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Pharmaceutical Research 2015;32:617–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-014-1490-4.
[11]
Plan E. Modeling and simulation of count data. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology 2014;3:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/psp.2014.27.
[12]
Broersen LHA, Pereira AM, Jørgensen JOL, Dekkers OM. Adrenal insufficiency in corticosteroids use: Systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2015;100:2171–80. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-1218.